Author: AbhishekMundra

Key Themes and Pricing Trends in the SAP Services Market | Webinar

On-Demand Webinar

Key Themes and Pricing Trends in the SAP Services Market

Enterprises have leveraged SAP for more than a decade to manage and streamline their core business operations. In recent years, SAP expanded its predominantly on-premise enterprise products to the cloud. In response, providers have invested in tools and accelerators to align with this shift, helping enterprises migrate to the cloud seamlessly – creating a rapidly growing market.

Join this webinar to learn insights into the latest pricing and investment themes, enterprise challenges, and solutioning approaches in the SAP services market.

What questions will the webinar answer for the participants?    

  • What are the key enterprise investment themes and opportunity areas for service providers in the SAP services market?
  • What are the enterprise challenges arising with the SAP and service partner community?
  • What are the approaches and key solution tenets that drive SAP pricing?
  • What are the pricing trends observed in SAP-managed and transformation services?
  • What are the differentiators and value adds proposed by leaders in SAP services?

Who should attend?

  • CIOs, CTOs
  • IT strategy heads
  • Heads of outsourcing
  • Procurement managers
  • IT department heads
  • Global sourcing mangers
  • Vendor managers
  • Heads of SAP services / application services
  • Senior sales leaders
  • Senior members of deal pricing teams
Prateek Gupta
Abhishek Mundra
Raghav Munjal

The Future of Retail and CPG: Balancing Economics, Efficiency & Experience | LinkedIn Live

LINKEDIN LIVE

The Future of Retail and CPG: Balancing Economics, Efficiency & Experience

April 26, 2023 |
9 a.m. CDT | 10 a.m. EDT | 3 p.m. BST | 7:30 p.m. IST

View the event on LinkedIn, which was delivered live on Wedneday, April 26, 2023.

Today’s retail and CPG enterprises are facing the dual challenge of adverse macroeconomic conditions and rapidly changing customer behaviors. While macroeconomic factors are putting pressure on input prices 💲 and razor-thin margins, shifts in customer behavior are translating into a demand for sustainable products and hyper-personalized omnichannel experiences.

💻📱Technology disruptions over the past few years have successfully mitigated these challenges and created new avenues of growth 📈 for both enterprises and service providers.

📢 📢 In this LinkedIn Live, our analysts will share insights into the key technology investment priorities of retail and CPG enterprises and opportunity areas for service providers.

What questions will the event address?

✅ What are the top investment priorities for retail and CPG firms?
✅ How are enterprises rethinking transformation while balancing customer experience, cost competitiveness, and sustainability?
✅ What is the role of the technology and service provider ecosystem in enabling this transformation journey?
✅ What challenges are enterprises facing in their present engagements with service providers?

How Enterprises Can Achieve Full Value from ServiceNow Investments | Blog

In response to changing market demands, ServiceNow has expanded its platform over the past two years, from primarily managing IT workflows to providing full enterprise solutions. Read on to learn the best practices from industry leaders to ensure your greatest return from ServiceNow investments.   

Since our inaugural ServiceNow Services PEAK Matrix Assessment in 2020, the software company has significantly expanded its portfolio to go beyond IT Service Management (ITSM) to new offerings that help clients drive business growth, increase resilience, and enhance employee productivity.

Our recently published second edition of the assessment found about 65% of enterprises are exploring scaling up ServiceNow investments for end-to-end process modernization. CIOs who have upgraded their IT workflow on ServiceNow are now looking to transform business processes and integrate the platform with existing systems of record, engagement, and intelligence.

Based on our interactions with industry leaders, we recommend enterprises consider the following factors when seeking to modernize their business processes with ServiceNow:

  1. Shift away from IT to business Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

The watermelon effect of KPIs in ITSM is not new. Over the past two years, we have addressed several situations where ServiceNow clients struggled with having all the metrics look green on the outside but are red on the inside.

The reason often is two-fold – tracking irrelevant metrics and overreliance on IT metrics. Enterprises need to track relevant metrics closely tied to business outcomes while being aware of the pitfalls in measuring these metrics.

ServiceNow customers are tracking business KPIs such as customer experience, reduction in touchpoints, percentage of issues resolved by self-healing, and cost efficiency. Leading service partners are proactively collaborating with customers to course correct and update KPIs and tracking methods during quarterly and mid-year reviews.

  1. Minimize customization

Early adopters leveraged ServiceNow to make custom applications and create a final product that mimicked organizational processes. These solutions were developed on the go to meet demand. As ServiceNow continues to push new and improved versions, it has become very difficult and costly for these customers to make updates due to the huge technical debt.

Clients that adopted ServiceNow largely out-of-box are more agile and tend to benefit from improved processes. Enterprises should modernize their processes to fit the standard offerings and minimize customization or wait for the offerings to sufficiently mature before investing.

  1. Select the right transformation partner

We think Albert Einstein’s famous statement, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results,” unfortunately, applies here. Most enterprises need qualified staff to help guide and manage the project over multiple years. They also need to deal with unplanned turnover, the ServiceNow talent gap, inflexible contracts that don’t allow for strategy changes, ever-shrinking budgets, and, last but not least, the desire to have measurable outcomes. But often, enterprises end up using the same vendor selection and RFP processes without taking these factors into account.

Leading enterprises have not only updated their vendor selection methods but also have started planning for attrition, contractual flexibility, and outcome accountability right at the beginning of the engagement.

Large enterprises now are more open to engaging with specialist ServiceNow partners for module-specific requirements, especially for non-ITSM products such as Human Resources Service Delivery (HRSD), Customer Service Management (CSM), and Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC). This is mainly owing to the specialized focus and right mix of flexibility and agility that large Global System Integrators (GSIs) often fail to offer.

We are closely tracking demand and supply-side developments in ServiceNow. For more insights, see our report, ServiceNow Services PEAK Matrix Assessment 2022, which sheds light on the ServiceNow partner ecosystem.

We would like to hear your thoughts on your ServiceNow investments and the growing adoption of innovative operating models to achieve business outcomes. Please reach out to us at [email protected] and [email protected].

You ca also find out What’s Ahead After a Decade of Digital Transformation in this webinar as we share perspectives on what’s in store for the digital transformation industry.

Three CRM Insights to Prepare for the Future of Customer Experience | Blog

Despite the overall growth in the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) industry, the CRM platform market remains static. To achieve the business value enterprises desire, changes need to be made. In this blog, we share our CRM insights and three recommendations for CRM platform evaluation.

With the rapid proliferation of channels, products, and customer personas, the industrialization of personalized experience delivery poses the biggest challenge for all enterprises across industries. CRM is integral to enabling this experience transformation.

According to Everest Group research, the overall CRM market has increased approximately 15% year-over-year, primarily driven by the growth of Salesforce and other SaaS applications of SAP, Microsoft, and Adobe.

But let’s not confuse the industry’s top-line growth with customer success. The Solow paradox or productivity slowdown is still here. The bottom line: today’s CRM platform market is oversold and underdelivered. In a frenzy to meet YOY linear growth targets and bigger deal sizes, almost 30% of the licenses sold go unutilized by enterprises.

Three key CRM insights to watch

As we enter Dreamforce’s 20th year, below are our recommendations on fundamental changes that are needed in the CRM industry.

1- Bridge the customer experience and customer success disconnect:  While most cloud CRM platforms are growing in high double digits, they are not achieving the same business value growth. Most customer success metrics are defined and managed by vendors and continue to have a singular focus on customer satisfaction. While an enterprise IT organization may be happy with completing implementations on time and within budget, our research suggests that almost 50% of enterprises are not satisfied with the business value realized from their platform investments.

Recommendation: CRM platform players need to evolve the definition of customer satisfaction (CSAT) and their customer success programs. These should be managed independently of the organization’s sales and marketing functions. Service providers must work closely with platform vendors and customers to proactively define and track IT-business metrics. Niche platform players such as Qualtrics stand to make a significant dent by putting experience and operational data side by side to wholistically define customer experience.

2 – Create data-driven and connected operations: Industry-specific cloud applications are a key investment area for most CRM vendors. However, our ongoing Salesforce industry cloud services PEAK Matrix assessment found CRM vendors are pushing these products rather than enterprises pulling for them. This is because these products need high customization and fail to make a dent in managing and integrating data for specific micro industries. Each micro-industry has a unique operating model that requires data architecture tailored to the context. These industry products need to get the data strategy right for each industry-specific operation and bring in the openness for ecosystem integration. Platform investments by Salesforce, Adobe, and others in the Customer Data Platform (CDP) space are a silver lining for the commerce industry. But these CDPs should eventually evolve into intelligent data hubs and provide a platform for enterprises to create dynamic and contextual applications.

Recommendation: Industry-specific cloud solutions need to be built by keeping data architecture and integration for the micro-industry at the core. Making such fundamental changes is difficult for platform giants, which creates opportunities for emerging platform vendors to compete and differentiate. Vendors such as Zoho have differentiated themselves in an almost monopolistic industry by taking a long-game strategy and changing products at the architectural level.

Service partners need to use their industry expertise and prioritize micro industries to closely innovate with both emerging and large platform vendors. Together, they need to build meaningful products for their customers rather than being caught up in the frenzy to fulfill license sale Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

3- Expand and further simplify platform native workflow automation and low-code capabilities: As many as 60% of new application development engagements consider low-code platforms, according to Everest Group’s recent market study. Present workflow-building tools and low-code capabilities that are native to CRM platforms are still immature. This is pushing enterprises to spend hefty dollars on workflow and low-code platforms and then invest additional money on customization to integrate them with their CRM platform.

Recommendation: Salesforce has been a pioneer in this space and continues to lead the market, which has resonated well with its customers. Other CRM vendors who lack capabilities and focus here may give Salesforce inroads into their existing accounts. Service partners need to educate the market about low-code and workflow automation’s potential to transform industry-specific customer experiences.

We will be attending Dreamforce this September to share our CRM insights and would welcome hearing your views on CRM platform evaluation. To schedule a meeting, please reach out to [email protected] and [email protected].

Attend our webinar, How are Leading Organizations Delivering Exceptional Customer Experience?, to learn more about customer experience today.

Cloud ERP Market War: Oracle Continues to Win Over SAP and Microsoft

Oracle still ranks number one in the cloud ERP market with high enterprise satisfaction for its licensing, functionality, integration and customization, talent and community, and user adoption. But SAP and Microsoft have made notable improvements over the past two years and are moving closer to the leader in the ERP cloud war. Read on to learn the latest insights and five things that companies today demand from large enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms.

In our blog in 2019, Oracle Wins Over Microsoft and SAP in the Cloud ERP BigTech Battle, we discussed how Oracle ERP Cloud is winning against SAP S/4HANA and Microsoft Dynamics 365.

Since then, we have interviewed more than 200 enterprise clients to collect feedback on major platforms as part of various PEAK Matrix® assessments, including Microsoft Dynamics 365 Services PEAK Matrix® Assessment 2021, SAP S/4HANA Services PEAK Matrix® Assessment 2021, and Oracle Cloud Applications (OCA) Services PEAK Matrix® Assessment 2022.

In our latest research, we share an updated analysis on the cloud ERP market and how this space has evolved. Key insights from these interviews are also summarized in our enterprise pulse study.

The below figure summarizes current enterprise satisfaction for ERP platforms across various dimensions.

exhibit 1

Cloud ERP market updates

Oracle continues to win the cloud ERP market competition, but SAP and Microsoft are inching closer. Let’s look at what has changed since 2019:

  • Oracle has improved its commercial flexibility, which was a major contention among enterprises. Its licensing model is now flexible enough to accommodate both cloud and on-premise workloads. This has eased Oracle customers to transition their core workloads to the cloud
  • For Microsoft Dynamics 365, multiple enterprises have vouched that talent availability and overall customer experience have improved, especially among SMB clientele. Adoption has increased due to mature sales and service capabilities along with affordable commercials. In general, Microsoft Dynamics has struggled with large enterprises in the past and is now making inroads into large clientele
  • For SAP S/4HANA, enterprises have observed that innovation from SAP into Business Technology Platform, together with mature partner solutions, have contributed to improved functionality and cloud capabilities. But SAP is not able to deliver a consistent experience across its on-premise, and cloud versions and its clients continue to suffer from integration challenges

What do enterprises expect from large ERP platforms?

  • Improve cloud functionality: Oracle cloud applications are a more mature offering than S/4 HANA and Dynamics. However, for all the vendors, the cloud versions will still take at least five years to reach the maturity of the on-premise version. For example, in Microsoft Dynamics, the maturity of products beyond sales and service is a concern, especially for marketing and commerce. Meanwhile, in Oracle, enterprises have expressed worries over the maturity of CX cloud; for SAP, HR, sales, and service modules continue to be concern areas
  • Enhance integration capabilities: Enterprises we interviewed said cloud ERP integration challenges continue to persist in the SAP landscape. End users often complain about broken experiences across cloud and on-premise systems. SAP needs to knit together all its business applications that are either developed in-house or acquired to work cohesively to deliver a superior end-user experience and enhance adoption
  • Strengthen partner ecosystem: Enterprises believe ERP platforms should further strengthen the partner program and solve challenges in the network ecosystem. They opine that System Integrators (SIs) fail to understand clients’ non-standard approaches and business-specific use cases. Present industry-specific applications across all three vendor ecosystems require high customization. Technology vendors should build scalable industry solutions in close collaboration with the enterprises and the SI ecosystem
  • Buttress talent availability: Another challenge enterprises continue to face is talent availability, especially for complex cloud modernization initiatives. The demand-supply gap is relatively higher for SAP skills compared to Microsoft and Oracle. Technology vendors should ramp up their investments in collaboration with service partners to scale up the talent base, especially for newer product areas
  • Offer hyperscalers flexibility: Enterprises believe that switching costs increase exponentially by tightly coupling applications with infrastructure. Customers want multiple vendors in their landscape to maintain price competitiveness. They expect Oracle and Microsoft to provide the flexibility to run cloud applications in an equally efficient manner on hyperscalers of their choice

Although current analysis shows Oracle continues to lead the cloud ERP market, it needs to continuously evaluate changing enterprise expectations and make targeted investments to consistently drive higher value for its clients.

How has your experience been with SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft? Please share your thoughts about the cloud ERP market with us at [email protected] and [email protected]. Or contact us.

Things May Never Go Back to Normal for Enterprise Platform Services | Blog

At the onset of the pandemic, a lot of software buying decisions were put on freeze, ongoing implementations had huge scope changes, and enterprise software needs dramatically shifted towards the cloud and SaaS.

Executives who are responsible for their organizations’ enterprise platform services are well aware of the disruption caused by the COVID-19 crisis. Here are three things that happened in 2020 that were not so normal.

  • Accelerated project timelines – At the beginning of 2021, UPS rolled out ServiceNow ITSM globally in 27 weeks; in a normal year, a project of this scale would have taken at least two years. While greenfield rollouts were few, there was a massive jump in projects that were incremental in nature, often related to platform modernization, new module implementation, and functionality improvement. The delivery timelines for these projects also drastically improved, in some cases up to three times faster, especially in verticals such as retail, healthcare, and manufacturing.
  • Shift from high on-premise to 100 percent remote delivery – A global service provider signed and delivered a US$10 million+ engagement for S/4 HANA implementation across nine manufacturing locations, replacing two legacy ERP systems, all in just 11 months and all remotely. In 2020, we saw multiple such examples where going from RFP to blueprinting to go-live and subsequent improvements happened in a complete remote model. For an industry that had historically emphasized on delivery teams to be on-premise, this was a huge shift.
  • Scope changes on the fly – Enterprise platform service deals typically have many scope changes simply due to their scale and the impact they have on business processes. These scope changes normally lead to enterprises’ dissatisfaction as service partners are not flexible with all the changes. While in 2019 ~25 percent of enterprises ended up meaningfully changing the scope during the entire course of platform implementation, this number jumped to ~60 percent in 2020.

Doing the above three things while maintaining the quality of delivery is nowhere close to normal. Our research suggests a 27 percent y/y improvement in average CSAT scores for enterprise platform services delivered in 2020, which is a testament to the fact that service partners and technology vendors did an amazing job of meeting enterprise expectations. (Based on feedback from 88 enterprises in CY2020 and 70 enterprises in CY2019, across multiple PEAK Matrix® assessments of enterprise platform services research.)

As we move out of the pandemic phase over the course of 2021, a lot of these not-so-normal things will not go back. That means enterprises will have a herculean task of ensuring that their service partners continue to meet their raised expectation bars and their future enterprise platform priorities. This makes the partner selection process critical.

Here are five things that enterprises should do when selecting their enterprise platform services partner in 2021:

  • Evaluate remote delivery capability – Remote delivery is here to stay. While over the last year we saw some service providers doing an amazing job of implementing projects over Zoom calls using multiple tools and collaboration solutions, many others still have a steep learning curve ahead. Enterprises should look for service providers’ investment in repackaging disparate tools into a single offering, which improves the overall reliability of services. IBM’s Dynamic Delivery, TCS’s Location Independent Agile, and Wipro’s Agile Anywhere are a few examples.
  • Check for talent with industry expertise – By virtue of multiple failed digital transformation initiatives, many enterprises have realized the importance of process modernization over just digital transformation. The increasing adoption of Pega and ServiceNow along with investments by other tech vendors such as Microsoft, Oracle, and SAP to build industry expertise into their software is a strong indication that having industry and process expertise from here on will be critical. In fact, in a recent work for a client on the need and urgency of industry- and function-specific talent, we discovered that 45 percent of enterprises regard it as vital, while 37 percent see it as good-to-have. Additionally, 66 percent of enterprises were willing to pay high price premiums for such talent. (Based on Everest Group research with 175 CXOs of enterprises with revenue > US$1 billion.)
  • Evaluate integration competency –  There is a huge difference between a go-live system and a system that is useful. With the increasing sprawl of SaaS, both internal and external integration has become a massive challenge for enterprises. For example, in our recently published Salesforce assessment, we found that almost 70 percent of enterprises struggle with integrating Salesforce with other applications and platforms within and outside the Salesforce ecosystem. Enterprise should look for service provider’s investment in building expertise and solutions that bridge this integration gap.
  • Look for capabilities across the entire stack – Any cloud platform that is implemented today will double its functionality scope next year; Salesforce and ServiceNow are the best examples of this. Thus, enterprises need to have a long-term horizon and should not partner with a service provider that has a hard time keeping up with the selected tech vendor’s innovation and only has capabilities around the vendor’s product offerings.
  • Ensure your service partner can be a thought partner – If there was one thing that this pandemic taught us regarding digital transformation, it would be that it is not only for the Walmart and Daimlers of the world; it is also for our local retail store and small-scale car manufacturing company. Thus, innovation is no longer a good to have or value-add in overall service delivery satisfaction…it is a must-have. Enterprises should evaluate if the service provider has processes that can systematize innovation even when delivering projects remotely.

What has been your experience with enterprise platforms and their service partners? Please share with me at [email protected].

Salesforce Acquires Slack: Salesforce Stands to Gain Much More Than Slack in the Long Run | Blog

There was much excitement on December 1, 2020, when Salesforce announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Slack, and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff called the US$27.7 billion deal a “match made in heaven.” In the days since, however, the market has significantly dampened that excitement, with Salesforce losing more in market valuation than the price it paid for the acquisition.

But we at Everest Group are bullish on the deal; we believe Salesforce has much to gain in the long term.

Microsoft’s erstwhile involvement

Microsoft considered buying Slack for US$8 billion in 2016, but ultimately decided to take this market on organically, releasing Teams within a year. Microsoft used the US$8 billion to invest in Teams growth through:

  • An ecosystem play – Microsoft leveraged its Office 365 ecosystem to increase the Teams user base. It effectively provided Teams for free as part of multiple Office 365 packages, providing a more holistic value proposition.
  • Aggressive sales – Microsoft started a price war with Slack by offering Teams as a free product or at a highly discounted price. With its deep pockets and bundled offerings, Microsoft effectively contained Slack, turning the market against it, causing its valuation to decline.

Slack’s story

They say necessity is the mother of invention, and Slack is the poster child for that. What began as an internal tool, developed out of necessity turned into a wildly popular chat and productivity offering. Then Microsoft set its sights on the space, effectively crushing Slacks’ growth. In terms of market adoption, before Slack stopped reporting daily active user numbers in 2019, it was able to grow to about 12 million users in seven years; Teams matched that number in only three years. Moreover, Teams continues to expand its presence with a daily active user base touching 115 million in October 2020.

In terms of market valuation, despite achieving robust revenue and user base growth, Slack has not been profitable, reporting a loss of US$138 million in 2019. Additionally, its market valuation has eroded significantly since its IPO listing: From its IPO price of US$38.50, Slack was trading at $25.89 on October 31, 2020, a valuation loss of ~33%.

In many ways, its rivalry with Teams and its ensuing market valuation loss made Slack desperate for an acquisition. Slack needed a partner to sustain itself and compete with Microsoft. Salesforce to the rescue!

How can Salesforce help Slack compete with Teams and Zoom?

One’s immediate reaction may be that Slack should be able to arrest its slide given its ability to reach into Salesforce’s deep pockets. However, our take is that Salesforce is good at selling to business units and sales and marketing folks, not to enterprise IT and tech, who would be the primary Slack buyers. That is Microsoft’s power alley – the area it rules. In addition to money, Salesforce will have to make big changes to its sales model to make a dent in Microsoft’s tight control of that space.

How does Salesforce benefit from this acquisition?

The acquisition comes at a time when Salesforce recognizes its need to build integrated suites for enterprises. Most of its competitors – Microsoft, of course, and SAP and Oracle – have been talking about integrating the front and back ends, especially as enterprises have started to realize the importance of end-to-end integrated suites cutting across ERP, CRM, and HCM.

This acquisition gives Salesforce the opportunity to move beyond the sales and marketing area and gain access to other parts of the organization. If integrated well with the Salesforce platform, Slack could potentially act as a unifying thread across ERP, CRM, and HCM, while also solving for the missing piece in their customer-360 value proposition.

Salesforce has made a couple of failed forays in the collaboration space with Chatter and Quip; the third time may be the charm with Slack, given its more robust offering and positive customer sentiment.

What does the acquisition mean for the market?

The acquisition highlights the fact that the industry is going through consolidation, and standalone products are finding it difficult to compete with larger players that offer bundled products. Moreover, the collaboration space is gaining significant traction among enterprises as remote working becomes the new norm. We wouldn’t be surprised to see Amazon or SAP getting into this space, and we’re wondering if we might see Atlassian, Splunk, or some other similar organizations in the acquisition news sometime soon.

If you’d like to share your thoughts on the acquisition or on Salesforce’s strategy, reach out to us at [email protected] or [email protected].

 

Salesforce Acquires Acumen: The Likely Ripple Effects in Professional Services | Blog

The news of Salesforce’s acquisition of Acumen Solutions on December 1, 2020, was completely buried under Salesforce’s whopping $US27 billion acquisition of Slack the same day. But don’t discount the Acumen acquisition – I believe it will be the cornerstone of Salesforce’s professional services strategy over the next several years.

Why this acquisition is unusual

For starters, tech vendors in general do not leverage M&As to enhance their professional services capabilities; most tech vendors’ M&A activity is driven by their technology arms. The Acumen deal is the only pure-play professional services partner acquisition that has happened in the past three years among big tech vendors, based on an analysis of 51 acquisitions by AWS, Microsoft, SAP, and Salesforce over that time period.

The acquisition comes at a time when most tech vendors are in a state of flux over their professional services strategies. For example, AWS grew its professional services arm by an eye-popping 40% over the past 12 months, while peers and other vendors were still figuring out the implications of the pandemic and whether they should be aggressive with their professional services offerings.

The acquisition is also important given the fact that Acumen was one of the few remaining pure-play Salesforce System Integrators (SIs) that was competing head-on with the larger SIs as a major contender in the market. Thus, the acquisition adds significantly to Salesforce’s professional services strength, as Acumen adds approximately 1,000 FTEs to the existing base of 1,000-1,200 FTEs currently working in Salesforce’s professional services arm, effectively doubling the overall headcount.

What’s in it for Salesforce?

Salesforce gains significant advantages from the acquisition, chief among them:

  • Bridging the talent demand-supply gap – Everest Group’s recent talent study suggests that the demand-supply gap for Salesforce services talent has widened over the past two years and now stands at more than 20% for areas such as Lightning, Mulesoft, and Einstein Analytics. Also, Salesforce is getting pushed out by other vendors such as Oracle, SAP, and Pega and needed to have talent to help clients increase adoption, an area where service providers have been struggling. The acquisition strengthens the footprint of Salesforce’s professional services arm in North America especially in areas such as Einstein, Lightning, and Service cloud.
  • Catering to demand for industry-specific expertise – More than 70% of Acumen’s current portfolio is concentrated in three industries: federal; Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI); and, manufacturing. The acquisition boosts Salesforce’s industry-specific agenda, which it has been driving on the technology side with Vlocity and the launch of industry cloud offerings. The acquisition also will have significant positive impact on Salesforce’s ability to serve the federal services space, where Salesforce has been able to capitalize on multiple opportunities post-pandemic.
  • Getting a nimble service partner – The acquisition also highlights Salesforce’s recognition that it needs to get more involved from a services standpoint. Pure play and niche SIs, in general, are faster to react to vendors’ technology innovation, and they are more flexible in meeting clients’ demands. The need for nimble service partners is more pertinent for Salesforce today given the volume of innovation that they have been bringing to the market.

What are the key implications going forward?

The Acumen acquisition has implications for enterprises, service providers, and, of course, Salesforce itself:

  • For enterprises: According to our Salesforce Services research (see our report, Salesforce Services – Solving for the Missing Link) more than 80% of clients said their vendor’s professional services arm is their go-to partner in defining the adoption roadmap when it comes to emerging products such as Mulesoft and Lightning. There is a clear time lag in the service provider’s ability to deliver on to the tech vendor’s innovation. This acquisition is a step in the right direction as strengthened professional services gives Salesforce an ability to deliver innovation faster in specific industries.
  • For service providers: Once the dust settles, this acquisition will force service providers to demonstrate their ability to think ahead of Salesforce’s innovation curve and be at the top of their game as truly agile partners. Service providers should think beyond the core platform and invest proactively in the marketing and commerce cloud and cross-skill talent in Mulesoft and Tableau. They should further develop a structured program to build industry and functional expertise in the existing Salesforce talent.
  • For Salesforce: As a result of this acquisition, some large SIs may perceive Salesforce Professional Services as a competitor – which might not be totally untrue – but could work against Salesforce. Even today, large SI partners believe core platforms (sales and service cloud) are not growing as fast as they want, and so they have curtailed proactive spending. Thus, the onus falls back on Salesforce to allay these fears and continue expanding its partner network.

It’s early days yet; only time will tell how this acquisition will actually shake out. But I have no doubt it will provide food for thought for other big tech vendors as they work through their professional services strategies over the next year. If you want to share your thoughts on the acquisition or on Salesforce’s strategy, reach out to me at [email protected].

How can we engage?

Please let us know how we can help you on your journey.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Please review our Privacy Notice and check the box below to consent to the use of Personal Data that you provide.