Author: RahulGehani

Outsourcing Pricing: 3 Pitfalls and 2 Unknowns Enterprises Need to Know in 2022 | Webinar

EXPERT PANEL

Outsourcing Pricing: 3 Pitfalls and 2 Unknowns Enterprises Need to Know in 2022

April 12, 2022 |
9 am CDT | 10 am EDT | 3 pm BST | 7:30 pm IST

The market for outsourced services has changed drastically in the past twelve months. With the talent shortage shaping up to be a long-term dilemma that will likely last years, compounded with industry uncertainty brought on by the Ukraine war, enterprises are navigating uncharted territory.

Watch this expert panel to discover three critical outsourcing pricing pitfalls that enterprises should watch for now and two unknowns to be aware of throughout 2022.

Our experts address the following questions:

  • What key elements will ensure that pricing-related uncertainties can be managed correctly in 2022?
  • What unknowns should enterprise buyers keep in mind for 2022?
  • What are the pricing pitfalls that enterprises should avoid?

Who should attend?

  • CIOs
  • CTOs
  • CDOs
  • IT executives
  • IT strategy leaders
  • BPO department leaders
  • GBS leaders managing IT and BPO outsourcing contracts

5 Success-driving Actions: How to Manage Extreme Outsourcing Pricing | Webinar

On-Demand WEBINAR

5 Success-driving Actions: How to Manage Extreme Outsourcing Pricing

Access the on-demand webinar, which was delivered live on February 8, 2022.

It’s a fact: rates are rising.

Outsourcing services have undergone a profound transformation in recent months driven by evolving client needs and operating models, the advent of new technologies such as digital, artificial intelligence, and machine learning, and most recently, a severe talent shortage.

These forces have resulted in increased rates across the services industry. Outsourcing contracts signed as recently as early 2021 may already be misaligned with market realities.

This on-demand webinar uncovers five pricing actions enterprises should take now to attain value without breaking the bank.

Our experts provide answers to the following questions:

  • What are recent pricing trends, and what is the future pricing outlook?
  • Should enterprises hold firm for lower prices or give in to vendors’ higher rates?
  • What levers can enterprises pull to stay within their overall IT or Business Services budgets?

Who should attend?

  • CIOs
  • CTOs
  • CDOs
  • IT executives
  • IT strategy leaders
  • BPO department leaders
  • GBS leaders managing IT and BPO outsourcing contracts

Our Experts

Rahul Gehani Bio Picture V1 2021 03 26
Partner
Janssen MichelRefresh gray square
Chief Research Officer
Sharma Abhishek Refresh gray square
Partner

Join our LinkedIn Live After Event

Catch our speakers live after our February 8 webinar, “5 Success-driving Actions: How to Manage Extreme Outsourcing Pricing,” as they break down the main takeaways and address the overflow of submitted questions which couldn’t be answered during the webinar. Don’t miss the opportunity to get a behind-the-scenes view of the conversation after the webinar event.

Feb 8 LinkedIn Live v3 03 LinkedIn live banner Feb 8 1 1

Why the Focus Is Returning to Cost of Living Adjustments and Benchmarking Clauses in Outsourcing Contracts | Blog

Once standard provisions in outsourcing contracts – Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA) and benchmarking comparisons – are needed now more than ever to ensure long-term success for both parties in today’s changed outsourcing environment. With the turns over the past half-year making it a seller’s and employee’s market, these clauses can ensure enterprises capture high-quality talent without being overcharged for service delivery. To learn more about why it’s time to refocus on these provisions, read on.  

Over the past six to eight months, the global services industry has experienced a curious turn from starting the year as a “buyer’s market” due to uncertain demand and portfolio consolidation at large and medium enterprises. Similarly, the talent market was an “employer’s market.”

Fast forward to today, and the contrast could not be starker. Demand for global services has been booming. Enterprises are looking to diversify their provider portfolios. All it takes is one look at the quarterly reports of providers to see it is a “seller’s market,” while on the talent side, it is an “employee’s market.”

What is even more striking is that the talent shortage that is most visible for high-end digital skills also very much exists for other skills. It is not surprising that service providers are struggling to hold on to their existing talent even though they are rolling out salary hikes, special skills allowances, employee retention funds, etc. Further, the booming demand is forcing companies to hire at even higher compensations to fill the positions of departing employees and new openings.

Against this backdrop, it is important to also consider these few additional macroeconomic factors:

Onshore (U.S.)

  • Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation has surpassed the 5% mark for the first time in 30 years
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics show that job openings are at an all-time high at an overall economic level

Offshore (India)

  • For the past two decades, India has consistently been a high inflation country, with CPI inflation generally ranging between 6% and 8%. Despite the high inflation, it retained a strong cost reduction proposition because of a broad trend of currency depreciation. However, over the past year, the Indian Rupee has appreciated against the U.S. Dollar. As a result, the strong tailwinds currency appreciation provided has been replaced by moderate headwinds

As a result, pricing both onshore and offshore is now trending upwards. We have witnessed service providers approaching enterprises with proposals of out-of-cycle price hikes that, in some cases, exceed 20%.

The client’s conundrum

Enterprises are facing a dilemma of whether to break the budget and pay the desired prices to service providers or risk facing shortages in quality talent and potential business disruptions.

While there are no easy answers, a few factors to keep in mind are:

  • It is widely accepted that the talent shortage is here to stay for three to five years. However, the intensity of the shortage could stabilize. For instance, in the U.S., some states are prematurely ending unemployment benefits, and COVID vaccination prevalence is increasing by the day. As a result, additional workforce might enter the job market, potentially reducing some of the demand-supply mismatch for low complexity roles
  • In India, if the Rupee returns to its depreciating trajectory, the need for higher prices could abate

Therefore, a more pragmatic, immediate approach for clients is to align on short-term pricing increases instead of agreeing to structural changes in prices that would apply for the remaining deal term. Instances where clients are already paying above fair market rates might not require any further price increases.

Contract solutions

While short-term pricing increases can be a tactical way to accommodate the pressure of price hikes, to remain aligned with the fair market prices in the medium- to long-term, it is critical for enterprises to push for the inclusion and enforcement of two key clauses: Benchmarking and COLA.

Having a balanced benchmarking clause that contractually allows for an ongoing/annual reset of prices to market standards is in the interest of both sides. It can guarantee providers do not overcharge for their services. At the same time, it can ensure that the contracted prices are not too aggressive and out-of-line with market realities, to the extent that they impact the quality of talent or services delivered by the provider.

For situations where benchmarking is not done regularly, the fallback is having a robust COLA clause that allows service providers to adjust charges on an annual basis to reflect a fair increase in delivery costs. Historically, COLA used to be present in all deals. However, in some outsourcing deals that we reviewed or benchmarked over the last couple of years, COLA had been taken out of the contract under pressure from enterprises.

While that could have been justified in a low inflation environment and a buyer’s market, in the current situation having a robust COLA clause will ensure the long-term sustainability of the contract for the enterprise as well as the service provider.

To explore how our pricing analytics services could benefit your enterprise and share your pricing experiences, contact Rahul Gehani, Partner, at [email protected].

Can Benchmarks Be Leveraged for Forward-looking Pricing Negotiations? | Sherpas in Blue Shirts

A colleague of mine recently had an interesting discussion with a senior stakeholder from a large buyer organization. The buyer had engaged multiple partners to benchmark the company’s contracted ADM prices every year since 2009 and had difficulty understanding why the actual pricing trend was opposite what the benchmarks suggested each year. After some probing, it emerged that the buyer was using the benchmarks to interpret likely future pricing, rather than assess current pricing.

Let’s look at the difference between the two via a weather example.

The average temperatures in Delhi in Q1 and Q2 2012 are summarized below.

Delhi Temperature

Clearly, temperatures increased consistently during Q1 and Q2. Based on that information, a tourist planning an August 2012 trip to the region could have concluded that it would be even warmer during that month and added more sunscreen to his or her list of pre-travel purchases.

In reality, as shown below, Delhi was cooler in Q3 (and it was rainy). If the tourist incorrectly surmised that past weather trends meant that August temperatures would be higher, he or she would have packed an extra pair of sunglasses, rather than an umbrella…and gotten wet.

Delhi Temperature2

Note: for those who use the Fahrenheit scale and are itching to know what Delhi’s temperatures were last Q1-Q3, an easy – but not quite precise – conversion is to multiply the Celsius number by two, and then add 30. (The actual formula is to multiply by 1.8, and then add 32.)

Similarly, although price benchmarks represent current market pricing, they may, or may not, indicate the future trend. Thus, they are not particularly useful for buyers trying to negotiate future prices with their service providers. Rather, proper pricing negotiations require having a pulse on multiple drivers broadly classified as demand-side, supply-side and macro-economic. Equally important is understanding the relevance of these drivers in the deal-specific context of a particular buyer. For example, in Everest Group’s PricePoint: Q4 2012 analysis of ADM services, we noted that prices were at the same level as 12 months prior. Looking ahead, supply-side cues indicated stability in operating costs, potentially indicating status-quo on pricing. However the recovery in demand for transformation projects is expected to materialize in more ERP deals. Thus, buyers with significant ERP initiatives could witness higher prices in 2013.

So how can benchmarking exercises work to a buyer’s benefit?

Here is Everest Group’s take:

  • Price benchmarks typically represent current market (or sometimes past) pricing. They can help identify whether a service provider has been, or is, over-charging. In many situations, buyers can realize more than 5-7 percent savings simply by calibrating their contracted prices per the benchmarks
  • Where pricing is currently in line with the benchmarks but is due for revision, understanding the pricing outlook is most beneficial. However, this involves accurate assessment of multiple pricing drivers without which any forward-looking pricing discussion will be incomplete (and could leave the buyer out in the rain, sans umbrella.)

 

How can we engage?

Please let us know how we can help you on your journey.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Please review our Privacy Notice and check the box below to consent to the use of Personal Data that you provide.