Tag

location optimization

Six Common Mistakes Enterprises Make when Developing Service Delivery Location Business Cases | Sherpas in Blue Shirts

By | Blog, Outsourcing

Everest Group regularly supports clients in developing fact-based business case models to assess all relevant costs and benefits associated with their service delivery portfolio and delivery location decisions.

Not surprisingly, we’ve seen an increase in this type of activity in the last several years due to technology disruptions, potential immigration reform laws, intensifying competition for talent, and macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties. We’ve also seen an increase in the number of faulty/incomplete business cases that, if unresolved, can result in unnecessarily high costs and less than expected benefits.

Six common mistakes enterprises make when creating their global service delivery location business cases.

#1 Clarity on the primary objective of the business case:

Establishing clarity on the key objectives of the business case for service delivery location selection is of utmost importance. Companies often include benefits of other initiatives (e.g., transformation) which may impact their overall locations footprint, but fail to include costs associated with these initiatives, resulting in a faulty business case. As business case assessment is typically done for long-term strategic decisions, it is critical to ensure clarity on the locations strategy and implementation roadmap under consideration.

#2 Underestimating the costs of “what it takes to get there”:

Companies often underestimate the costs associated with exiting their current location (e.g., lease termination and severance costs); disruption in their existing locations (e.g., loss of knowledge due to higher than expected attrition); migrations (e.g., employee relocation, technology migration, parallel/shadow run); and set-up of new centers (e.g., capex, cost of hiring and ramp-up, training costs, etc.)

Example: A global Financial Services company had a 12-month long shadow/parallel run to effectively complete knowledge transfer for high complexity processes. This negated most of the arbitrage-related benefits for the initial 12-18 months. In fact, the company incurred relatively higher total cost of operations (TCO) until steady state operations was achieved.

Example: In a recent engagement, the location selection for a Latin American client’s shared services center was greatly influenced by applicable withholding taxes (i.e., the Argentinean government levies a ~31.5% withholding tax on import of global services from certain locations such as Mexico). These factors significantly impacted the relative cost attractiveness of locations under consideration.

#3 Overestimating benefits:

Companies often plan multiple transformation and optimization initiatives in parallel with changes to their services delivery portfolio. In such cases, things seldom pan out as planned, and the savings achieved are significantly lower than expected in areas including:

  1. Headcount reduction from process improvements
  2. Delivery pyramid optimization
  3. Implementation of automation/technology solutions
  4. Economies of scale (in cases of location consolidation)
  5. Optimization of management and administrative overheads

Example: A BFSI firm changed its planned strategy midstream, as its initial plans to fund the business case for large scale service delivery location consolidation by reducing FTE headcount by ~ 6,000 could not be realistically achieved.

#4 Stakeholder misalignment:

A service delivery location decision must involve multiple stakeholders including onshore business leaders, offshore delivery leads, functional and GIC leaders, migrations and/or transformation teams, corporate real estate, and technology teams. Any lack of coordination among these stakeholders can pose challenges in alignment on data used, key assumptions, the roadmap for service delivery portfolio changes, and the plan for other transformation/optimization initiatives. All stakeholders must be kept in the loop from the beginning of the location evaluation, and they must periodically periodic sign-off on the approach.

#5 Industry benchmarks:

While it is important to leverage industry benchmarks, companies must contextualize information to their own unique situation. The specificity of operations or the role a location plays for the company can be different from the typical value proposition of that location/geography.

Example: A recent engagement for a global Financial Services client demonstrated that, despite industry benchmarks that indicated Location A offered ~20 percent cost savings over Location B for typical BPO processes, the client’s specific processes and talent needs reversed the cost attractiveness of the two locations.

#6 Talent competition in the local market:

Companies often underestimate the true extent of competition in the local talent market, and the impact of attrition on sustainability of their operations. This impacts a company’s ability to scale initially, retain talent, and back-fill lost staff.

Example: A global manufacturing company faced significant challenges in hiring language skills for its newly setup shared services center in the APAC region, resulting in significantly lower arbitrage savings than expected.

While developing business cases models can be a significant challenge, we believe that addressing the above-mentioned points can reduce chances of error significantly. Learn more about Everest Group’s Service Delivery Locations practice.

The Philippines: Future Foe or Long-term Friend? | Sherpas in Blue Shirts

By | Blog, Outsourcing

With the uncertain political situation in the Philippines and the comments President Duterte has made about distancing from the United States militarily to align closer to China and Russia, many are concerned about what this means for the relationship between the Philippines and the U.S. And rightfully so – this would be a major shift, and over time could be a cause for concern.

At the same time, the Philippines has been quick to point out that the commercial and social relationships between it and the United States are very strong, and that it wants and expects those to continue.

And therein lies an important point… a rebalancing of military relationships does not automatically lead to poor commercial and social relationships between countries.

In a quick exercise to demonstrate how countries can have a variety of types of relationships with the United States, I did a super simple comparison of several military and social dimensions in the graphic below. In addition to the Philippines, I chose India, Malaysia, and Turkey to represent a cross-section of countries near Russia and China that have some level of meaningful connection to the United States. Turkey is a member of NATO, India is a major trading partner for services and goods, and Malaysia is an interesting mix of relations with China and the U.S. (not to mention the Malay flag looks very similar to the United States flag).

I looked at language, religion, sports, and use of NATO-sourced fighter craft (both trainers and actively deployed.) Those without NATO-sourced fighter craft tend to attain theirs from Russia or China. Most countries not in NATO and near Russia have some mix of fighter aircraft.

Philippines U.S. relationship

Based on this very simple comparison, many in the global services industry might be surprised to see that India appears to be the least well-aligned to the U.S. on most dimensions. In particular, India depends primarily upon Russia for various types of military equipment, beyond just aircraft, and India is an important export market for Russia.

By contrast, the Philippines is very closely aligned to the U.S. on all dimensions, which explains why the average Filipino has a hard time with the concept of weakened commercial and social ties to the U.S.

Time will tell what actually happens. But we should all remember that military, commercial, and social ties can operate somewhat independently. Relationships between most countries are complex and multi-faceted, so a change in one area may be slow to impact the overall relationship.

Service Delivery Locations

By | Uncategorized

Service Delivery Locations

From Asia to Central & Eastern Europe to Latin America and Africa, we have
assisted hundreds of organizations with their service delivery location decisions

snow-covered mountain with climbers near top with green overlay on image

Onshore, Nearshore, or Offshore Delivery?

As global service delivery models have matured, hundreds of onshore, nearshore, and offshore locations have emerged and matured. Each has unique attributes in terms of costs structures, talent markets, and risk profiles. As the recognized leader in service delivery locations, we provide a range of services from access to data and insights to location selection and portfolio optimization

Advanced Locations Tool

Power users of global services not only need to select locations and occasionally rebalance their portfolio, but also proactively monitor location developments in their current locations and make frequent decisions on how to place work in their priority geographies. Our Advanced Locations Tools is designed to both help track locations trends and provide the fact base for making standard work placement decisions (not to mention educating executive leadership on variations in cost, attrition, talent pool, risk, and other factors).

The Advanced Locations Tool covers location-specific detailed information on:

  • 13 mature traditional functions (e.g., Finance, HR, IT, ADM, Procurement, Contact Center)
  • 4 emerging traditional functions (e.g., Marketing BPO, Legal)
  • 20 processes in digital services under Social & Interactive, Cloud, Mobility, and Analytics

LEARN MORE

Spacecraft

Global Sourcing Risk Radar

Global events (such as political crises, natural disasters, and currency fluctuations) coupled with developments in the provider community (visa irregularities, management changes, and corporate fraud concerns) amplify the need to strategically and intentionally monitor global sourcing risk. Everest Group’s Global Sourcing Risk Radar offering provides the insight to effectively monitor, manage, and mitigate your global sourcing risk.

LEARN MORE

Pin in map with lines

Location Optimization

Combining our unparalleled location datasets and expertise in locations, we assist organizations with a wide array of service delivery location issues – selection, sustainability, portfolio balancing and more across all geographies (on-world, only, please). Trusted by the world’s leading users of global services, we can assist with any need.

LEARN MORE

Locations Insider™ Published Reports

Our Location Insider offering provides ongoing analysis of service delivery location trends and the most important cities, regions, and skill sets. Access to reports and our analysts is available as an annual membership.

VISIT REPORT LIBRARY

Download our Complimentary Viewpoint | Locations Optimization 3.0

Read our complimentary executive viewpoint, which discusses what a locations strategy entails and how organizations are maturing into what we call “Locations Optimization 3.0.”

The Everest Group Difference

Global Sourcing

Sakshi Garg

Vice President

Contact Sakshi

Recent research from Everest Group Recent Locations Insider™ Reports

View all

European Digital Services Talent Handbook: Prepare for Digital Disruption

Given the massive adoption of digital services that the global services industry has witnessed in the last few years, it is cl[...]
See Report

“Next-wave” Location Profile – Chennai, India

Everest Group’s Next Wave Location Profiles provide crisp, yet insightful assessment of emerging / “Next-wave” countries or cities for service[...]
See Report

“Next-wave” Location Profile – India

Everest Group’s Next Wave Location Profiles provide crisp, yet insightful assessment of emerging / “Next-wave” countries or cities for services deliver[...]
See Report

“Next-wave” Location Profile – San Jose, Costa Rica

Everest Group’s Next Wave Location Profiles provide crisp, yet insightful assessment of emerging / “Next-wave” countries or cities for s[...]
See Report

Market Insights

By | Uncategorized

Everest Group’s Market Insights™ reveal actionable intelligence from across the full spectrum of our research in concise, easily accessible infographics

Read More

Everest Group Identifies Digital Sourcing Hot Spots | Press Release

By | Press Releases

As the search for digital talent intensifies, Everest Group offers a “MAP” of the world’s top locations for digital service delivery

Where in the world is the best location for digital services? Enterprises need to know, says Everest Group—a consulting and research firm focused on strategic IT, business services, and sourcing—which is today releasing key insights from its recent research on top locations for digital services delivery, “Global Hotspots for Digital Services.”

“Global delivery has become talent-centric as enterprises, thinking beyond arbitrage and efficiency, intensify their search for digital talent to support digital business initiatives such as social and interactive, mobility, analytics, cloud, Internet of Things (IoT), robotic process automation (RPA), digital cybersecurity and more,” said H. Karthik, partner, Global Sourcing, at Everest Group. “As a result, the choice of locations for digital service delivery has become a key strategic decision and will become even more critical as the delivery of digital services witnesses robust adoption in the next two to three years.”

Everest Group estimates that the global digital services market is currently 300,000 to 350,000 FTEs strong and accounts for 5 to 7 percent of the global information technology / business process (IT-BP) industry. Going forward, Everest Group expects this share to increase owing to the faster annual rate of growth of the digital services market (14 to 18 percent) as compared to the overall IT-BP industry (7 to 9 percent) during the past four to five years.

Digital srvcs delivery global FTEs (004)

Key Findings:

– India is the largest destination for delivery digital services (accounting for approximately 55 percent of the market in terms of FTEs), driven by the availability of high-quality talent, synergies with existing sourcing operations in the area, and low operating costs.

– Onshore tier-two North America and tier-two Europe constitute approximately 24 percent of global digital FTEs and are important geographies for real-time innovation and speed-to-market for existing and next-generation digital technologies.

– Nearshore Europe constitutes approximately 14 percent of the global digital FTEs, attractive to buyers due to multilingual service delivery for social media, analytics and mobility services.

– Asia-Pacific (excluding India) accounts for approximately 7 percent of global digital FTEs, with selective evidence of high-end digital services delivery in cities such as Singapore, Beijing and Malaysia.

– Latin America is relatively less mature for digital services delivery as compared to India and Nearshore Europe; however, it is witnessing traction in supporting regional demand and also in providing medium-to-low complexity digital services to North America.

Everest Group also assessed the leading digital services delivery locations on the dimensions of talent and cost, and grouped them in its proprietary MAP Matrix™ according to maturity, arbitrage, and potential.

MAP Matrix (003)

– The cities of Bangalore, Mumbai and Hyderabad are clear Leaders.

– Major contenders include Manila, Prague, Sao Paulo and Dublin, which have sizable digital IT talent driven by cloud services.

– Aspirants are typified by Beijing, Buenos Aires, Kuala Lumpur and Krakow.