IO Renewal Rollercoaster | Market Insights™
TCV of North America-based IO renewal deals is high in 2014 through early 2015 but plummets from 2015 through early 2016
TCV of North America-based IO renewal deals is high in 2014 through early 2015 but plummets from 2015 through early 2016
Three industries account for more than half of ITO renewals Q2 2014 through Q1 2016
BPO contract renewals from Q2 2014 through Q1 2016 are highly concentrated
APAC emerging as significant hub for IO renewals; large deals up for renewal in Australia Q2 2014 – Q1 2016
Over US$12 billion worth of health care provider ITO contracts is due for renewal between 2014 and 2019, with bumps in 2014 (30% of the total) and 2016 (57% of the total).
BPO Contract Renewal Through Q1 2016 Concentrated in North America
Both buyers and providers in the global services industry are scrutinizing how to react to the dramatic depreciation of the Indian currency. Since 2000, the rupee has traded in the range of 40-50 rupees to the U.S. dollar and in recent years was stable at 45. But it depreciated during the last two years and now hovers at 64.26 per dollar — a 23 percent drop against the dollar. Unfortunately, many existing services contracts were signed with pricing based on an expectation of 45 rupees to the dollar.
Never mind that the Indian providers have been able to use the depreciation to offset wage inflation and competitive tensions — customers only envision the ka-ching sound of a cash register when they look at this windfall to providers’ profits. They feel entitled to share in the value created by rupee depreciation. In fact, some buyers have asked their providers for a corresponding reduction in price; and in some instances, particularly where contracts terms have completed, they are succeeding.
But there are unintended consequences for those who ask for the price reduction.
We have observed several providers responding to this challenge by shortening contract lengths. In some instances we’ve seen them unwilling to extend new pricing beyond one or two years.
This is understandable — after all, what goes up must come down. If providers give pricing concessions that are commensurate with the fall in the rupee, they also want to be protected on the upside. The value of the dollar could depreciate, for instance, and the providers would then be in a very difficult situation.
With contract durations of one or two years, buyers need to recognize that their interaction costs will rise and they will spend a lot of time and money negotiating contracts.
None of us is smart enough to know what will happen with currencies; thus, determining contract pricing is complicated. Including specific hedges around currency is painful on both sides because of the uncertainties in the work allocation between offshore and onshore. The current situation with rupee depreciation underlines the absurdity of long-term pricing commitments.
Historically, currency volatility has played to the providers’ benefit because they were able to adjust their scope and pricing through change control. But the current depreciation of 23 percent plays against the providers; such a large shift in FOREX significantly affects their profitability. Given how much FOREX has shifted in their favor, they feel they need to protect themselves if they give up some of that gain. Certainly one means of protection is shorter contracts, and we’re starting to see that trend emerge.
©2024 Everest Global, Inc. Privacy Notice Terms of Use Do Not Sell My Information Research Participation Terms
"*" indicates required fields