In today’s complex U.S. healthcare landscape, one thing is clear: payment integrity is no longer just a compliance function, it’s a strategic priority. With rising costs, rampant fraud, and billions lost to inefficiencies, health plans are now under pressure to recover revenue and ensure accurate payments without alienating providers or members. The Payment Integrity (PI) market is now approaching $10 billion in size as of 2024, and it’s not hard to see why.
Reach out to discuss this topic in depth.
The high cost of getting it wrong:
Let’s start with the harsh reality: the healthcare system bleeds billions due to fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). Consider these staggering stats:
- Over $200 billion is lost annually to FWA
- >50% of denied claims are never reworked
- The average cost to recover overpayments is $18 per appeal
- One-third of PI resources are still consumed by administrative work
Meanwhile, high-profile fraud cases, from lab testing scams to inflated hospice claims continue to expose the vulnerabilities in the current system. It’s a stark reminder that payment integrity failures aren’t just about dollars; they also erode trust in the system.
Clearly, the status quo isn’t sustainable. As payers look to improve both the effectiveness and efficiency of their PI operations, the conversation is shifting, from retrospective correction to proactive prevention.
The shift to pre-pay is real and rapid
Historically, payment integrity efforts have been heavily skewed toward post-pay audits, with nearly 85% of the market expenditure directed there. But a quiet revolution is underway. Investment in pre-pay PI solutions is growing twice as fast as post-pay, at a 26% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) vs. 13%reflecting a growing appetite to detect and prevent improper payments before they happen.
Why is pre-pay gaining momentum?
- It offers faster interventions, reducing downstream administrative work
- It helps minimize provider abrasion, improving relationships
- It enables cost avoidance, not just cost recovery
- And, increasingly, it delivers higher Return on Investment (ROI)
At least 25% of health plans launched new pre-pay initiatives in the past year, signaling a broader shift toward prevention-oriented models.
The power of data and technology
Advanced analytics, Machine Learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI) are powering this transformation. Payers are leveraging historical claims data and predictive models to flag potential issues before payments are made. On the post-pay side, vendors are using AI-driven tools to identify overpayments and automate recovery workflows.
Yet despite these advances, a technology capability gap remains. Many plans cite challenges such as:
- Limited access to modern platforms
- Siloed data systems
- Lack of interoperability across PI tools
- Inadequate integration of audit and recovery processes
Bridging this technology gap is crucial for unlocking the full value of payment integrity programs.
Sourcing models in transition
Another challenge? Strategy, or the lack thereof. According to Everest Group, 3 out of 4 payers have yet to finalize their payment integrity sourcing strategy. Most are experimenting with hybrid models, blending in-house teams with external vendors.
Each sourcing model brings trade-offs:
- Outsourcing provides scalability and specialist expertise but often involves contingency fees >12%
- Insourcing allows greater control but can be hamstrung by outdated systems, manual workflows, and talent shortages
A smart approach is to match the sourcing model to the process. For example, data mining and analytics are more commonly outsourced, while claims edits and reviews tend to stay in-house.
Vendor overload and the call for governance
Many plans are also grappling with vendor sprawl; some use 7 to 13 vendors for payment integrity. This creates unnecessary complexity, including:
- Duplicated efforts across vendors
- Technology systems that don’t speak to each other
- Varying contract terms and contingency fee structures
As a result, there’s a growing call for vendor consolidation and centralized governance. Forward-thinking payers are setting up Payment Integrity Operations (PIOs) with dedicated leadership, streamlined workflows, and clearer accountability. In some cases, these units report directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), a sign of how critical payment integrity has become to enterprise performance.
Final thoughts: From compliance to competitive advantage
The payment integrity market is undergoing a significant transformation, from fragmented and reactive to unified and proactive. As health plans navigate this evolution, those that prioritize data-driven strategies, right-fit sourcing, and strong governance will not only reduce leakage but gain a competitive edge.
In an environment where every dollar counts, payment integrity is more than a back-office function, it’s a strategic imperative.
If you found this blog interesting, check out our Payment Integrity Solutions PEAK Matrix® Assessment – Everest Group, which delves deeper into another topic regarding Payment Integrity.
If you have any questions or want to discuss the evolutions of Payment Integrity in more depth, please contact Ankur Verma ([email protected]).
