Author: Somya Bhadola

Cyber Insurance Market: Carriers Navigating through a Changing Risk Landscape

With increased cyber attacks and data breaches post-pandemic, cyber insurance to protect against the rising digital threats is growing in demand. Cyber insurers can benefit by partnering with service providers to seize opportunities for growth and profitability in this fast-growing market. Read on to learn how.     

Cybersecurity continues to be a top priority for enterprises across all industries, primarily driven by increased cyber attacks and data breaches in the wake of COVID-19. Enterprises are increasingly strengthening firm-wide cyber defenses and turning to cyber insurance as a mitigating measure to counter the rising threats in today’s increasingly digitized world.

In particular, the pandemic has accelerated the severity, frequency, and complexity of ransomware attacks. Data from the US Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) suggests the total value of suspicious activity reported in ransomware-related incidents during the first six months of 2021 was US$590 million, more than the US$416 million reported for all of 2020. The frequency has also gone up, with 658 ransomware-related suspicious incidents being reported during the first six months of 2021, representing a 30% increase from the total reports filed for 2020.

Costs associated with cyber attacks also are rising. According to the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, the average data breach costs rose from US$3.86 million to US$4.24 million in 2021.

All of these factors have led to a substantial increase in cyber insurance pricing across the world. An analysis by Marsh shows US cyber insurance pricing increased 96% year-over-year during the third quarter of 2021, which also represented a 40 percentage point increase from the second quarter of the year.

1 1

Image 1: US insurance market pricing change – overall commercial vs cyber insurance segments

US cyber insurance market provides significant growth opportunities

Direct premiums for US-domiciled insurers stood at US$2.75 billion in 2020 – less than 1% of the overall direct written premium in the US property and casualty (P&C) insurance market – reflecting the runaway growth in cyber insurance. This segment has also grown at a decent pace over the last five years, registering a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.3% during that period.

Standalone cyber insurance policies are gaining prominence and have seen faster adoption than packaged policies sold as add-ons to other insurance products/policies. This can be attributed to enterprises’ need for broader coverage and a better understanding of policy terms and costs.

While most carriers have mainly serviced corporate clients, they are now starting to focus on the retail segment by providing standalone cyber insurance products that have typically been sold as add-ons to homeowners insurance. For example, Chubb recently launched Blink, a new personal cyber protection offering that covers expenses related to identity theft, fraudulent wire transfer, cyberbullying, and ransomware extortion.

Insurers are also offering joint go-to-market (GTM) products to provide comprehensive cyber risk management solutions to enterprises. In 2021, Allianz and Munich Re partnered with Google Cloud to launch a solution for Google Cloud customers that combines the risk-transfer expertise of Allianz and Munich Re with Google’s security capabilities to provide clients tailored coverage.

Advent of insurtechs in the cyber insurance market segment

The insurtech space has recently witnessed increased activity where most newcomers are catering to specific segments like small to medium enterprises. Insurtechs are leveraging their tech capabilities to make the underwriting process more streamlined and automated while incumbents continue to face legacy issues.

However, insurtechs lack the capital resources of their traditional counterparts and hence are forming alliances with traditional insurers to combine their respective capabilities. Some insurtechs are also offering coverage on behalf of incumbents through the Managing General Agent (MGA) model.

  • Cowbell Cyber, a full-stack insurer providing cyber coverage to SMEs, raised US$100 million this March to expand its go-to-market channels and increase investments in data science, underwriting, risk engineering, and claims management
  • At-Bay, a cyber insurtech MGA, announced a partnership in September 2021 with Microsoft to offer data-driven cyber insurance coverage to Microsoft 365 customers

Challenges for insurers in a hardening cyber market

While cyber insurers have experienced significant top-line growth, profitability remains a major concern as payouts have outstripped premium growth. The increased payouts have led to higher loss ratios. The loss ratio for US cyber insurers increased from a 42% average during 2015-19 to 73% by 2020. Insurers are responding by narrowing the cyber coverage scope and limiting cyber capacity. They also are imposing sublimits for ransomware coverage and adding coinsurance requirements to cyber policies.

2

Image 2: Insurers narrowing cyber coverage scope and limiting cyber capacity

How can cyber insurers benefit from BPS partnerships?

Partnering with Business Process Services (BPS) providers can help cyber insurers in the following ways:

Providing underwriting talent: As the adoption of cyber insurance grows, it will also lead to higher volumes for carriers. Service providers can provide support by standardizing parts of the underwriting process to enable carriers to handle increased work volumes. This can include deploying straight-through processing by standardizing the intake process and applying rule-based engines for low-premium policies to free up time for underwriters to focus on larger policies. They can also take over non-core pre- and post-underwriting work and help create scalable Centers of Excellence (CoEs) at profitable locations.

 Enabling technology: As carriers tighten their underwriting requirements with an increased focus on analyzing enterprises’ history of ransomware incidents and cyber breaches, they will heavily rely on third-party tools and public data sources to evaluate the insureds’ level of risk. This provides an opportunity for service providers to work with carriers to provide such tools and applications to help them assess risks associated with a particular firm.

Ensuring compliance: Amid the ever-evolving cyber threat landscape, governments and regulators across the globe are introducing new cybersecurity-focused legislation. The US Congress passed a new cybersecurity law in March mandating critical infrastructure entities to report cybersecurity incidents and ransomware payments to the relevant authority within 72 and 24 hours, respectively. Service providers can support carriers on various compliance-related matters. While some providers have compliance-specific expertise in licensing and filings, others have dedicated teams for compliance review and obligations. Third-party BPS providers can leverage these resources and work with carriers to ensure compliance.

Partnerships critical to the cyber insurance market’s future

As carriers seek growth in the cyber insurance market, they will need to strike the right balance to also achieve profitability. At the same time, service providers will have to keep up with the evolving market and appropriately build their cyber capabilities.

By working together, carriers and service providers can address some of the current market challenges and capitalize on the opportunities in the cyber insurance space to achieve sustainable growth.

For more information, please read our comprehensive assessment of the players in the P&C Insurance BPS segment, Property and Casualty (P&C) Insurance BPS – Service Provider Landscape with PEAK Matrix Assessment 2022.

To discuss opportunities in the cyber insurance market, please reach out to Somya Bhadola at [email protected] and Dinesh Singh Udawat at [email protected] or contact us.

 

Resilience and Stability in the Workers’ Compensation Industry – This is the Right Time for Claims Transformation to Secure Future Growth | Blog

As the workers’ compensation industry emerges from the pandemic, leveraging digital technologies to transform claims handling and taking a customer-centric approach will help carriers maintain profitability. By using automation, analytics, and digitalization, players can differentiate themselves. To learn about the key workers’ compensation trends to pay attention to, read on.

The workers’ compensation industry has remained profitable through the pandemic, with claims severity remaining consistent and frequency continuing to decrease. But reduced net written premium, low-interest rates, and the economic slowdown are creating top-line pressures. Moreover, the sustainability of profits is not guaranteed.

As COVID-19 subsides and most industries return to normal workways, the workers’ compensation industry could face difficulties in holding on to gains if it doesn’t chart a dedicated plan to improve productivity, employee experience, and employer mandates to create market differentiation.

Process standardization and simplification are the need of the hour. The workers’ compensation industry must move from the “repent and repair” model to “prevent and prepare” by leveraging business intelligence through an end-to-end real-time data flow across processes to enable a more customer-centric approach toward claims handling.

Currently, efficiency is impacted by the lack of information that results in back-and-forth requests on multiple claims touchpoints. By integrating processes, carriers can obtain real-time data to design standard workflow for Straight-through Processing (STP), exception handling capabilities, fraud detection and claim reserves calculation, and reduce overall claims function cycle time.

Challenges to overcome for claims transformation 

In addition to concerns and uncertainty about the long-term effects of the pandemic, the workers’ compensation industry faces the challenge of outdated workflows with heritage issues such as:

  • Lack of information at each node in the claims management process that increases cycle time and leads to poor end-user experience
  • Paper-based processes that are roadblocks to enabling a virtual ecosystem consisting of digital payments, paperless documents, e-signature, e-inspection, and sundry processes
  • Cumbersome manual functions that should be automated
  • Lack of a framework for standardized processes and segregating functions, requiring customization such as objectionable and non-objectionable items having to follow the same workflow
  • Claims not being linked to risk assessment and reporting, which impacts new business and renewals and the mapping of profitable and loss-making segments
  • Inability to benchmark claims, assess claims performance, and understand market impact

To continue its growth, workers’ compensation industry players should look to implement digital transformation and optimize processes to reduce claims turnaround time. Carriers who focus on digital solutions and leverage data through automation and analytics will successfully pivot for the future.

Traditional claims versus digital claims

Picture1

Exhibit 1: Everest Group

Three workers’ compensation industry trends to watch

1 – The role of automation

Workers’ compensation claims consist of workflows requiring minimal manual intervention where automation can work as an enabler providing numerous benefits such as:

  • Enhanced user experience through conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) for First Report of Injury (FROI)
  • Improved data validation and elimination of human error, enabling early-fraud detection and reduction in leakages
  • Automated claims routing for risk assessment through SOPs for STP, exceptions, and large claims
  • Auto approval of bills based on claim and treatment parameters can shorten handling time
  • Better claims capacity, improved backlog on open claims, speed to adjudication, and faster return-to-work solutions

Digital intake can remove friction and deliver a captivating experience for all stakeholders. By focusing on automation, workers’ compensation carriers will not only improve operational efficiency but also reduce operational costs – resulting in bottom-line benefits.

2 – Advancement in analytics

By adopting enhanced analytical capabilities, workers’ compensation carriers can increase their focus on the end-user experience and take a more proactive, prevention-based approach. Here are some ways this can be done:

  • Predictive and prescriptive analytics for insights on safety parameters will help prevent accidents and injuries
  • Predicting risk upon claim intake will smoothen the claim cycle for all stakeholders
  • Auto assignment of claims to an adjuster with relevant experience for backend issues
  • Individual and aggregated claims-based rules with persona-specific dashboards for different injury types
  • Implementing Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for assessing analytical potential

Advancement in analytics with proper predictive modeling techniques will reduce claims cost and improve claims severity, which, in turn, will deliver enhanced profitability.

3- Digital ecosystem and a safe workplace

The evolution of workers’ compensation claims in the future will depend largely on the assessment of intake efficiency, moving away from redundant processes, and instituting digital and data-led workflows. Technology usage will not only depend on the number of datasets with a carrier but also on the value generated to create new models for transforming the entire claims solution.

The cornerstone for transformation should be prevention and preparedness. With many organizations choosing to operate in a hybrid working model post-pandemic, it is imperative to assess the long-term impact of such changes. Internet of Things (IoT) and telematics can help achieve this through initiatives such as:

  • Smart workplaces with sensors, cameras, and other intelligent devices for continuous supervision
  • Digital collaborations for safety training and mechanisms with loss controllers
  • Wearable devices for loss prevention and control
  • Creating digital safety communities

With the pandemic pushing workforces to stay at home, telemedicine has gained popularity providing employees with medical consultation and reducing the away-from-work time. It is offering immediate care and a faster inquiry process by having expert medical professionals available. Telemedicine also helped promote claims advocacy and assisted in intake and triage through digital authorizations and workflow development for assigning priority to claim categories.

In the end, employers want stability and predictability of final claim costs. Regardless of how these macro trends affect the Workers’ Compensation industry, the focus should be on creating a safe workplace and taking all measures to prevent injuries and hazards.

To discuss workers’ compensation industry trends, reach out to Abhimanyu Awasthi at [email protected], Somya Bhadola at [email protected], or contact us.

Workplace leaders are also now able to focus more on creating an experience-centric workplace through digital technologies, delivering superior user performance and job satisfaction. Learn more in our webinar, Top Strategies for Creating an Employee-focused Digital Workplace.

Telematics in Insurance – A Big Opportunity yet to be Fully Explored | Sherpas in Blue Shirts

Price competition used to define the competitive dynamics of the P&C insurance industry. However, as margins started squeezing with low interest rates and rising claims costs, it became imperative for insurers to focus on product differentiation in order to attract new customers and drive premium growth.

This is when usage-based insurance (UBI), an insurance product model where the premium varies according to the risk of claims that the insured’s policy-related behavior poses, started gaining traction. UBI is noteworthy as it offers a remarkable opportunity for insurers to deliver hyper-personalization and evolve from a product-centric to a customer-centric business mindset.

To date, the auto insurance segment has been the most aggressive adopter of the UBI model, which is enabled by the underlying telematics infrastructure. Telematics technology enables insurers to capture each customer’s driving data, which is then used to continually update the customer’s risk profile and compute the payable premium. Data collection devices have evolved from black-box to OBD-II dongles to in-built telematics units in automobiles and smartphones.

UBI’s Business Case is Strong; however, Sourcing Gets Complicated for Insurers

We expect the market for UBI to grow substantially at a CAGR of ~40 percent during 2018-2020, with an estimated 35-40 million UBI policies in force by the end of 2020. This is certainly impressive growth.

However, to launch UBI products, insurers must make substantial investments in connected devices and data infrastructure. Moreover, not all insurers have the scale, risk-appetite, investable capital, or technology expertise to make significant inroads into UBI. Thus, insurers are leveraging third-party vendors to support their telematics journey.

Yet, the vendor ecosystem is fragmented, making it challenging for insurers to determine what organization to partner with.

Here’s the breakdown of the three major categories of telematics vendors:

Telematics Service Providers (TSPs)

These have the capability to manage the entire value-chain, from telematics device sourcing to device deployment and maintenance to end-customer engagement to telematics data management. However, as a single TSP might not be able to provide access to all the underlying connected devices, insurers must pre-strategize their requirements for data depth and breadth. There have been cases where insurers have entered into partnerships with multiple vendors with varying competency to leverage connected devices and technology maturity.

Data exchanges

The core value proposition of this class of vendors lies in their access to huge volume of data and their data handling capabilities, which reduces the burden of data management at the insurer’s end. Players that have entered this market also have developed a modest understanding of the insurance sector, which enables them to provide risk assessment support to insurers. However, while data exchanges typically can augment insurers’ telematics journey, they cannot provide end-to-end support.

OEMs

OEMs have emerged as significant competitors to the other classes of vendors due to their direct control of the point-of-sale. As the telematics unit is prebuilt into the automobile, insurers do not have to worry about the entire infrastructure management of telematics devices. However, partnering with an OEM could also mean loss of revenue from value-added services.

Telematics in Insurance – A Big Opportunity yet to be Fully Explored - potential impact

Service Providers as the Orchestrator – Big Opportunity Waiting to be Capitalized

With each of the categories of vendors specializing in specific parts of the telematics value-chain, insurers face a big challenge in connecting with different parties for different values, and in managing the multi-vendor ecosystem.

This is where IT/BP service providers can enter the picture. To date, they have failed to establish a competitive differentiation for themselves in this market. However, considering they have a sound understanding of insurers’ businesses, operations, and IT systems, they could provide significant value as the orchestrator of this branched ecosystem.

They could look to source the best value from different classes of vendors by tying partnerships with select technology vendors across the ecosystem. Then, they could serve as a specialist to help insurer wrap their operations around telematics technology to drive product differentiation.

In this model, service providers could – potentially – offer an integrated value proposition that would involve: owning the implementation risk; providing value-added services such as risk assessment and customer management support; managing the complexity involved in coordinating with multiple classes of vendors; and assuming responsibility for the risks (e.g., business risk, technology lock-in, etc.) associated with engaging with niche firms.

This could be a win-win-win scenario, for insurers, end-customers, and providers.

How service providers ultimately decide to capitalize on the telematics opportunity remains to be seen. However, they should be cognizant of not frivolously trying to compete where their expertise does not lie, and instead leverage their strengths to make themselves most relev

How can we engage?

Please let us know how we can help you on your journey.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Please review our Privacy Notice and check the box below to consent to the use of Personal Data that you provide.