Month: January 2017

Obamacare Repeal could Hurt Indian IT Industry | In the News

The US is the biggest outsourcing destination with companies like Tata Consultancy Service, Infosys, Cognizant Technology Solutions and Wipro dominating this space.

Two years ago, a report quoting research firm Everest Group said US healthcare related contracts were expected to more than double to about $68 billion in 2020, from nearly $31 billion two years ago, largely due to Obamacare.

Read more

Supply Chain Planning BPO – Navigating the Continuum from “Transactional” to “Complex” | Sherpas in Blue Shirts

Supply chain planning BPO is a relatively new entrant into the global services arena. Organizations are now turning to specialist providers that can deliver a range of services across delivery, master data management (MDM), aftersales, and reporting & analytics. A number of leading broad-based BPO providers have developed capabilities in this area to complement finance & accounting and procurement outsourcing offerings.

However, as is typical with a service that is not very tightly defined, supply chain planning BPO consist of completely different sets of underlying services, depending on the client context.

On one end of the spectrum, supply chain planning BPO services can cover relatively transactional activities such as:

  • Data management for inventory planning
  • Master data updates and validations
  • Status reporting and integrity checks
  • Basic conclusions from SAP/ERP data extracts to support planning activities

On the other end, supply chain planning BPO services have been seen to cover quite complex activities such as:

  • Forecasting and demand analysis
  • Inventory planning and scenario analysis
  • Network and distribution planning
  • Working capital management

Both sets of services have different skill set requirements, educational qualifications, staffing metrics, and talent management regimes. The transactional activities require basic numerical skills, some working knowledge of ERP systems, and good reporting capabilities. The complex manifestation of supply chain planning is much more judgement based, and requires operations planning skills, understanding of network planning/optimization tools, and excellent analytical abilities.

In a competitive or sole-sourced bid situation, any wrong assumptions could have significant implications on deal profitability for the service provider or pricing competitiveness for the buyer. Therefore, it is critical for both parties to understand and articulate where the specific service lies on the complexity continuum.

During the deal tenure, this poses additional challenges during a benchmarking or contract review/renegotiation exercise. We have often observed providers putting forth a “blended” rate covering the entire set of services, which limits the transparency and flexibility to objectively and accurately assess the pricing. Case in point: as part of a recent contract review, we had to go through the qualification and job description of each individual on the account to enable an apples to apples comparison. This led to the identification of significant value leakage due to a blended rate covering all kinds of supply chain planning activities that was higher than the fair market price for the complexity of the underlying services delivered.

It will be interesting to observe how the market evolves and service providers develop a tighter definition of these services to ensure there is no confusion during solutioning and pricing of contracts. If you were on the buy- or sell-side of a supply chain planning BPO deal, our readers would love to hear your experience!

Internet of Things Services Market Will Double by 2020 | Press Release

Accenture, Atos, HCL Technologies and IBM are named Leaders in Everest Group inaugural PEAK Matrix™ list of top Internet of Things service providers

Given the huge potential of the Internet of Things (IoT)—most of which is yet to be realized—enterprises are making significant investments in partnership with key service providers to explore new growth areas. As a result, Everest Group expects that the IoT services market will more than double in the next three years, reaching US$18 billion by 2020.

Enterprises are exploring ways that IoT can be used to achieve higher efficiency, enable data-driven decision-making and develop new revenue opportunities through customer-centric products and services.

**Read more about how enterprises are “Seizing the IoT Opportunity”**

With enterprises and service providers considering IoT as their next big opportunity, Everest Group has identified intriguing trends that are emerging from the current adoption pattern:

  • Eighty-seven percent of enterprises are optimistic about the returns on their investments in IoT.
  • The percentage of IoT projects moving from pilot to production has jumped four-fold from 2014 to 2016.
  • All industries are gearing up for IoT adoption, with manufacturing leading the way with 36 percent of IoT adoption across all industries.
  • Developing a strong partner ecosystem is extremely complex and requires disruptive vision.

“Enterprises are increasingly adopting IoT to improve operational efficiency and create disruptive business models,” said Chirajeet Sengupta, vice president at Everest Group. “A number of players across the IoT stack are making huge investments to grab a larger share of the pie, but most fall short on expectations of a transformation partner. Service providers can use this opportunity to draw on their engineering and services expertise and embrace new engagement models to help enterprises with long-term innovation.”

The current use cases of IoT are dominated by the need of enterprises to drive operational efficiency. However, we do expect enterprises to leverage IoT to fundamentally transform their business going forward. In fact, Everest Group has identified four distinct classifications of enterprises based upon the business objectives they hope to accomplish through their IoT initiatives:

  1. Engagers: Engagers represent 17 percent of IoT adopters; these enterprises drive IoT adoption largely for customer engagement and creation of experiences.
  2. Optimizers: Optimizers (63 percent) adopt IoT mainly to solve operational issues and improve internal efficiencies.
  3. Integrators: For Integrators (14 percent), the objective of IoT adoption is growth for the entire enterprise ecosystem.
  4. Innovators: IoT adoption by Innovators (6 percent) results in transformative disruption and “unthinkable” business models.

“Enterprises should adopt IoT across all categories, which will lead to new revenue streams and adoption of new business models,” added Sengupta.

Announcing the IoT Services Market Leaders

In its inaugural Internet of Things PEAK Matrix assessment, Everest Group explores the vision, services suite, scale of operations and domain investments of 16 IoT service providers. Everest Group has identified the following Leaders, Major Contenders and Aspirants:

  • Leaders: Accenture, Atos, HCL Technologies and IBM
  • Major Contenders: Cognizant, EPAM, HPE, L&T Infotech, NTT DATA, TCS, Tech Mahindra and Wipro.
  • Aspirants: CGI, Infosys, Luxoft and Prodapt

***Download Complimentary 4-page PEAK Matrix™ Preview Here***

Trends in the IoT services market as well as detailed insights into each of the 16 providers listed above are provided in the 92-page report, “Internet of Things Services — PEAK Matrix™ Assessment and Market Trends — IoT: Bigger Than the Hype.”  A preview report is available for complimentary download here.

*** Download Publication-Quality Graphics ***

High-resolution graphics illustrating key takeaways from this report can be included in news coverage, with attribution to Everest Group. Graphics include:

  • Internet of Things Adoption is Led by “Optimizers”
  • The Internet of Things Technology and Services Provider Ecosystem
  • Internet of Things Adoption Trends
  • Internet of Things and the Transformation Agenda
  • Internet of Things Adoption: A Definitional Framework

About the PEAK Matrix™

The Everest Group PEAK Matrix is a proprietary framework for assessing the relative market success and overall capability of service providers based on Performance, Experiences, Ability and Knowledge. Each service provider is comparatively assessed on two dimensions: market success and delivery capabilities. The resulting matrix categorizes service providers as Leaders, Major Contenders, and Aspirants. Companies that demonstrate strong upward movement in successive reports are recognized as Star Performers. Everest Group recently announced a recalibrated methodology, in which innovation, intellectual property and technology take center stage.

How can we engage?

Please let us know how we can help you on your journey.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Please review our Privacy Notice and check the box below to consent to the use of Personal Data that you provide.